Helen Matturi signed up for the Red Cross disposal teams responsible for safely burying highly infectious victims as the outbreak began to tighten its grip on Sierra Leone's capital Freetown in 2014."At the onset of the Ebola outbreak, it was men that were handling the corpses of women, sometimes in an exposed fashion.Ebola bred fear and suspicion, particularly in rural areas where many believe that foreigners are responsible for spreading the disease, including the very humanitarian groups who helped overcome it.They are celebrated as heroes by their government and the international community, yet many face the harsh reality of stigmatisation rather than gratitude once back in their communities.The worst outbreak of the tropical fever in history ravaged west Africa over two years, infecting -- by the most conservative estimates -- almost 29,000 people and killing more than a third.Ebola Corpse ManThe fever, high-quality wholesale Automatic Loading And Unloading CNC Cylindrical Grinding which can cause fatal haemorrhaging, organ failure and severe diarrhoea, spread to 881 health workers, killing more than 500.Stigma, shame, discriminationA UNICEF survey of 1,400 households across Sierra Leone in 2014 found that Ebola survivors suffered high levels of stigma, shame and discrimination. The hostility encountered by both west African and western aid workers and medical staff has manifested itself not just in low-level disapproval but in sporadic bloodshed.

As well as shattering health services, economic growth and family life, it has also sewn deep fissures in communities hit hardest by the contagion.The hostility has hit not just health workers but also survivors, made pariahs by the fear of contagion and because their very existence is a painful reminder for families who lost loved-ones."The tropical pathogen, one of the deadliest known to humankind, is spread through contact with the bodily fluids of an infected person showing symptoms such as fever or vomiting, or the recently dead. "When some friends tracked him down and asked the reason for abandoning the house where we were living together, his answer was: 'I don't want an Ebola family'.Guinea and Sierra Leone saw numerous episodes of mobs attacking ambulances and burial teams as they imposed a state of emergency and began restricting movement of their populations."In some instances, I was openly called the Ebola Corpse Man and, since the nickname was persistent, I had to move," he said.Ebola passed on from survivors whose blood had been given the all-clear is thought to have been behind two small outbreaks in Liberia after it was initially declared Ebola-free.Momoh Sesay, a middle-aged farmer in Kambia, a major trading post in northwestern Sierra Leone, was already struggling with grief after losing his two wives and four children to the epidemic. I wanted to keep the dignity of women if they were dead," she said.He survived his own infection, but encountered hostility rather than sympathy when he returned home.Victor Koroma, another member of a Freetown burial team, told AFP he was forced to move home six times as landlords or neighbours found out how he was earning a living.

The violence reached a grim nadir in 2014 when eight members of an outreach team in southern Guinea were slaughtered by protesters who denied the existence of Ebola and denounced a "white conspiracy".Medical charity Doctors without Borders estimates around three-quarters of survivors are dealing with a variety of post-Ebola complications including headaches, fatigue and eye problems. In another survey by Sierra Leone's health ministry and the United States' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 96 percent of respondents reported discrimination toward people who had beaten Ebola. Freetown: They may have conquered Ebola but survivors of the fever and the heroic workers who saved them face a new struggle: acceptance by communities after the end of the deadly epidemic.Ebola bred fear and suspicion, particularly in rural areas where many believe that foreigners are responsible for spreading the disease.Soon after joining up, her fiance left for work one morning and never returned. "Everything was went well at first when I was discharged," he told AFP.Scientists are working to establish how long it can persist in other bodily fluids and tissues such as they spinal column and the eye, and for how long it could remain infectious.An exacerbating factor has been the discovery that the virus can stay in semen for at least nine months after a patient has recovered, six months longer than previously thought.".It is due to be declared over as Liberia gets the all-clear Thursday, thanks to a brave army of doctors, nurses, grave diggers, contact tracers and others there and in neighbouring Sierra Leone and Guinea."But as soon as word went round that some male survivors sometimes have the virus in their semen, many of my best friends would wave to me from afar and then hurry on

"HKers will not scare off in the face of wolf warrior policy.That could include police cracking down on demonstrators and Chinese officials involved in Hong Kong policy -- as well as banks that conduct transactions with anyone involved in curbing the territory&China CNC Universal Cylindrical Grinding Machine Manufacturers39;s freedoms.Chris Patten, Hong Kong's final British governor before the 1997 handover, said the proposal signalled a "comprehensive assault on the city's autonomy" and would be "hugely damaging".China's move this week would circumvent Hong Kong's legislature by having it imposed by the national parliament, according to Wong and other campaigners. If it happens, we'll address that issue very strongly," Trump said.An attempt to have Article 23 pass through Hong Kong's legislature in 2003 was shelved after half a million people took to the streets in protest against it.Local pro-democracy lawmaker Tanya Chan said Beijing had "shown zero respect for Hong Kong people".It followed repeated warnings from China's communist leaders they would no longer tolerate dissent in Hong Kong, a semi-autonomous city that # endured seven months of massive pro-democracy protests last year.The State Department warned China's actions could impact its decision on that status.President Donald Trump gave a vague initial response that nevertheless warned of a stronger reaction.

Activists said the planned national security law, if implemented, would be one of the most significant erosions of Hong Kong's liberties since 1997.But the clause has never been implemented due to fears it would destroy Hong Kong's cherished civil rights..US senators on Thursday also introduced legislation to impose sanctions on any entity involved in curbing Hong Kong's autonomy.In announcing the plans late on Thursday night, the Communist Party gave few specifics for the planned law other than it would strengthen "enforcement mechanisms" for Hong Kong.US warningsThe United States reacted swiftly to China's announcement, with State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus warning that imposing such a law on Hong Kong would be "highly destabilising, and would be met with strong condemnation from the United States and the international community".Eroding freedomsHong Kong has been allowed a limited form of autonomy since returning from British to Chinese rule in 1997, with those unique freedoms enshrined under a "One Country, Two Systems" handover agreement."Beijing's growing interference could have a chilling effect on other nations struggling for freedom in China's shadow," he said."Beijing is attempting to silence Hongkongers' critical voices with force and fear," Wong said on Twitter, while expressing defiance.

"I don't know what it is, because nobody knows yet."This is the end of Hong Kong, this is the end of 'One Country, Two Systems', make no mistake about it," Civic Party lawmaker Dennis Kwok told reporters.Prominent democracy activist Joshua Wong said China's message to protesters seeking to maintain their freedoms was clear.Hong Kong: China has launched one of its fiercest assaults on Hong Kong's treasured autonomy with its move to impose a security law, pro-democracy campaigners said Friday as they vowed to take to the streets in protest."Many Hong Kongers must be as angry as us now, but we must remember not to give up," she added.Article 23 of Hong Kong's mini-constitution, the Basic Law, says the city must enact a law to prohibit "treason, secession, sedition (and) subversion" against the Chinese government.The US Congress late last year angered China by passing a law that would strip Hong Kong's preferential trading status if it is no longer considered autonomous from the mainland."On internet threads and chat apps used by the pro-democracy movement, there were calls to resume the protests of last year that were largely subdued in recent months because of coronavirus restrictions.However, a huge pro-democracy movement has built in the face of fears China has been steadily eroding those freedoms.The proposal for the security law -- expected to ban treason, subversion and sedition -- was introduced into China's rubber-stamp parliament at the opening of its annual session on Friday morning."Hong Kong people will have to face the choice for their future," said one comment on the Telegram platform often used by protesters, calling for people to rally on Sunday.Senator Pat Toomey, who spearheaded the legislation, described Hong Kong as "the canary in the coal mine for Asia"

. “Audiences would come to watch a film because of the filmmaker, not because of the new faces. It is hard to garner audiences on face value unless you make a film purely on a concept,” explains the critic.On the other hand, Murtaza points out that there is no strategy to launch a newcomer.. She says that though these actors are associated with big banners, good content was missing in their films. “Nepotism prevails in the industry. Even the Sunny Deol-backed thriller Blank, starring Dimple Kapadia’s nephew Karan, drew blank at the box office. “If these debutantes are directed by Karan Johar, SLB or Rohit Shetty, then the film will have a chance to be successful. Today, people want something that they relate to rather than someone else’s life living in abroad,” he shares.Sharmin Segal, Meezaan Jaffrey and Sanjay Leela Bhansali“The blend of established actors and newcomers is a safe deal. While Salman Khan might have garnered a good fan following for himself and his films, his success didn’t guarantee a safe landing for his protégés. Mayank backs this opinion, saying that the big face in the film will surely pull the audience to the cinema halls. Pranutan Bahl, granddaughter of the late renowned actress Nutan, and Zaheer Iqbal, Salman’s childhood friend’s son, were launched in Notebook and in spite of the film getting good reviews, the film failed to interest the audience.Talent vs contentEvery year, hundreds of films make it to the screen but only a few newcomers actually get the recognition..Pranutan Bahl, Salman Khan, Zaheer IqbalFilm critic Mayank Shekhar agrees that getting backed by big banners and producers is not enough to make any film a hit, though he agrees that they also need star directors or producers. “Gone are the days when people would enjoy Karan Johar or Yash Raj style of film making.Meanwhile, film critic Murtaza Ali Khan believes that making a film successful is not dependent on face value or the actors’ backgrounds anymore, there is a need for a strong concept. When Hrithik Roshan was launched in Kaho Naa.

Those include Ananya Pandey and Tara Sutaria whose début film Student Of The Year 2 didn’t do well at the box office. It is too much. In these films, they have been backed by the banners but nothing else,” explains Mayank, adding that people will not go and watch a film because Salman Khan’s name is mentioned on the poster. Good stories and concepts have great importance,” says Murtaza, who observes that there was a time when these big banners were able to pull the audiences to cinemas, but this is the time when the audience is wooed by realistic stories. Pyaar Hai, it was only him in the entire phase. “Either the newcomer should be padded by some known actor, or they should make a small budget film with a good conviction,” says the filmmaker. Similarly, the year also witnessed Javed Jaffrey’s son Meezaan being launched opposite Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s niece Sharmin Segal in Malaal. Trade analyst Rajesh Vasani explains that talent is just as important as the big banners. If they want to launch a newcomer they should plan, it can’t be just accessed,” he rues in conclusion. Student of the Year worked despite having newcomers was because it was directed by Karan Johar. Ultimately, it is the talent and content that always works. “Even if the big star is not dominating the film, and the other person is a new face, the audience will come and watch the film because it is a star-driven film. Any film works on the basis of its first teaser and trailer,” says Rajesh.The first half of 2019 has been a mixed bag in Bollywood which saw surprise hits in Uri and Kabir Singh while many big banners failed the box-office test, despite being backed by A-list production houses. While some do manage to garner interest, courtesy their famous parents, they fail to bring the audience to the cinema halls. Despite the ace director’s production house promoting the film and the newcomers, it failed to do well.

In the last few years, Salman Khan has launched careers of many Bollywood stars but the last few— namely Sooraj Pancholi-Athiya Shetty in Hero, Ayush Sharma in Loveyatri and now Parnutan and Zahir in Notebook— have failed to set the Box-office ringing. These actors get industry backing, but high-quality China Automatic Loading And Unloading CNC Cylindrical Grinding that doesn’t mean they have talent as well. Now it’s like every movie has a new face of someone’s child.“Audiences have evolved in many ways. Sonakshi Sinha was launched opposite Salman Khan in Dabangg and Sanya and Zaira starred with Aamir Khan in Dangal. Filmmaker Fauzia Arshi adds that just because big names and famous families are supporting the newcomer, it does not translate to their success. They should also have equal talent,” explains the analyst. “Every month we see one new face launched. While Deepika entered the limelight opposite Shah Rukh Khan in Om Shanti Om, Anushka too made her debut with Shah Rukh Khan in Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi. This begs the question of whether launching a new face with an established actor is a good idea, rather than all-new faces for the first time. And despite strong marketing and strategic promotions, some failed to get the cash registers ringing for their films. Fauzia too supports the idea of launching a newcomer with an established actor, so that the producer can recover the cost of the filmmaking. “It is not necessary that every newcomer, with some star producer or director’s backing, would work well, merely because he has a brand name.Backed by starsWhile bringing new talent to the screen is pivotal to the industry, it is also to be noted that actors like Deepika Padukone, Anushka Sharma, Sonakshi Sinha, Ranveer Singh, Priyanka Chopra, and most recently Sanya Malhotra and Zaira Wasim, were launched with established actors. It also saw a bunch of newcomers debuting in Bollywood. This element should be there, to begin with,” suggests the critic. Instead, there is a flood of all new faces. People want to see what they have not thought of,” she says

One wore a colourful Somali headscarf, in a nod to her Somali-American roots; the other, Rashida Tlaib, wore a maroon Palestinian thobe.The Tlaib episode is notable for several reasons. Millions watched it on the social media and on television. Tlaib’s use of inappropriate language is far beyond the narrow codes of decency that are viewed as permissible to most. The House majority leader, Democrat Nancy Pelosi, said she would not have used such words herself but that Tlaib’s words were certainly “nothing worse than (what) the President has said. Muslim-American organisations, many that balk at giving women, particularly women who do not cover their heads, leadership positions within their own organisations and boards, have been eager to embrace the two new emblems of Muslim-American leadership. It is not something that Muslim-American organisations (beyond those with a political and civil-rights bent) are inwardly enthusiastic about; it is, however, what they will regularly have to celebrate. That, however, is how it is — and in uttering the words, uncivil as they may have been, Rashida Tlaib has shattered more stereotypes than many generations of Muslim women put together. Given their roles within the Democratic Party’s progressive caucus, both Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar are slated to be the most liberal voices in Congress, a fact that is also likely to push once-conservative Muslim-America further to the left.Nearly every newspaper around the world covered the history-making event.

The freedom afforded to Tlaib in America is not a freedom she would enjoy in many parts of the Muslim world.Tlaib’s statement also reveals the turn that Muslims in America will have to take in the years to come. Not only will the face of Precision Grinding Machines for sale Muslims in America be female, it will be very outspoken and unafraid, and willing to fight a President who has made Islam the most suspiciously viewed religion in America.org, which has long opposed President Donald Trump and his policies. Many did. Few, Muslim or non-Muslim, would have guessed that one of the two new Muslim-American representatives would be the first to do so. Together, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib became the first Muslim women in the history of the US to become two of over 400 House representatives. Republicans, eager to find a reason to castigate the now winning and gloating Democrats — particularly a brown, Muslim and very progressive Democrat — were quick to denounce the language used by Tlaib. She stood by her words; she had said exactly what she had intended to say, and what she had meant to say. On Thursday, January 3, 2019, two Muslim-American women were sworn into the United States House of Representatives.These facts are notable because they are uncommon ones in other places where Muslim women hold office; in most Muslim-majority countries, not only would a woman be criticised for using what is deemed inappropriate language, the feeble protections that safeguard freedom of expression would readily be mowed over. Many agreed with her; a hashtag echoing her call for impeachment trended on Twitter for hours as angry Democratic supporters rallied in favour of Tlaib, noting that she had finally said what so much of the country has been thinking and saying.By arrangement with Dawn.And, yet, it is just such an expression of Muslim rage that is admissible given the bans, surveillance and demonisation that Muslim-Americans routinely face in Trump’s country. When asked to take the microphone, representative Tlaib recounted a conversation she had previously had with her son.

No sooner had the clip featuring Representative Tlaib hit the contentious airwaves of American cable news that it went viral. Far less noxious language used by Muslim women in political office in Muslim-majority countries has resulted in far greater consequences. And we’re going in there and we’re going to impeach the (expletive). Threatening Republican mobs did not gather outside her house, and while Trump did say that her comments were “highly disrespectful” and that she had “dishonoured herself” when specifically asked, he too was powerless to actually stop her from using similar language in the future. Through one or another rule or agency directive, she would face immediate consequences, likely even losing the power of her elected position. For starters, while she may have been criticised by certain news media outlets and Republican politicians, she did not face any actual consequences for her use of indecent language. “Bullies don’t win,” her son had told her. Many of the more than 100 American women elected to the House last week would have liked to give to the President a dose of what he has been dishing out to everyone else. Tlaib said she responded with, “Baby, they don’t. Such was the excitement about her thobe that a Twitter hashtag, #showyourthobe, asked other Palestinian-American women to also display their own embroidered traditional garments. Cameras followed the two everywhere, from the moment they arrived in the capital, to the time they along with their families celebrated after the oath of office was administered.President Trump has used some of the filthiest and profanity-laced language for women.This, however, was not how the hubbub over Rashida Tlaib’s swearing-in would end. The cameras that had been trailing the newly elected representative followed her to a reception held that evening by the progressive organisation MoveOn.For her part, Tlaib refused to apologise. The House minority leader immediately demanded an apology, using strong language to criticise Tlaib.” Other Democrats, particularly those belonging to the prim and trite “when they go low, we go high” Obama-Clinton camps, who have long insisted that they must stand for civility and not bow to the depths Trump plunges to, were also critical.” Applause followed and Tlaib quickly gave up the microphone. She was not officially censured; the US government did not begin any proceedings against her